Skip to main content

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.1 8B

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.1 8B: Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.18/M vs $0.20/M input tokens), while Llama 3.1 8B is better for long-context tasks (128,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 8B for lower token spend and choose Llama 3.1 8B when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini Embedding 2
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Embedding 2

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.000030
Per Request
$0.003000
Daily
$0.09
Monthly
$1.095
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than Gemini Embedding 2

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Embedding 2Llama 3.1 8B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window8,192 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output3,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryembeddingefficient
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoembeddings
textcode
Release Date3/10/20267/23/2024

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Embedding 2 and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens10% cheaper than Gemini Embedding 2. Meanwhile, Llama 3.1 8B offers a significantly larger context window at 128,000 tokens vs 8,192 for Gemini Embedding 2.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini Embedding 2 is a embedding model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 8B targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini Embedding 2 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Embedding 2 charges $0.20/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Embedding 2 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 8B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Embedding 2 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, embeddings)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (128,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Embedding 2

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Context window: 8,192 tokens
  • Max output: 3,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 8B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 8B
  • Smaller context window than Llama 3.1 8B

Llama 3.1 8B

  • Input pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Embedding 2 (Google)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini Embedding 2 today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Embedding 2 or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Gemini Embedding 2 — that's 10% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Embedding 2 and Llama 3.1 8B?
Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8,192 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 119,808 tokens in favor of Llama 3.1 8B.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Llama 3.1 8B offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 8,192 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Llama 3.1 8B for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Embedding 2 costs about $0.90/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Gemini Embedding 2.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.