Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Compare OpenAI and Google AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Cost Differences

+$0.001750
Per Request
+$0.175
Daily
+$5.25
Monthly
+$63.875
Yearly

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs more than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniGemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisionaudiovideocode
Release Date2/2/20263/25/2025

Codex Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and Gemini 2.5 Pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codex Mini is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Gemini 2.5 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Codex Mini.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Google — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Googleinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Gemini 2.5 Pro is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini 2.5 Pro targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $10.00 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codex Mini has the edge here at $6.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Gemini 2.5 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Codex Mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $1.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,800,000 tokens in favor of Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codex Mini is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 2.5 Pro offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Codex Mini for budget sensitivity or Gemini 2.5 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs about $18.75/month. Overall, Codex Mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $6.00 out) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles