Skip to main content

Google vs Meta (via Together AI) Pricing Comparison

Full API pricing breakdown, model lineups, and category coverage.

Total Models
10
Avg Input
$0.6775/1M
Avg Output
$4.23/1M
Cheapest Model
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Most Expensive
Gemini 3 Pro
Price Range
$0.375 -$14.00

Meta (via Together AI)

Details →
Total Models
6
Avg Input
$0.965/1M
Avg Output
$1.098333/1M
Cheapest Model
Llama 3.1 8B
Most Expensive
Llama 3.1 405B
Price Range
$0.36 -$7.00

Decision Guide: Which Provider Should You Choose?

If your priority is pure token cost, Meta (via Together AI) has the lower average combined input + output rate in this comparison at about $2.063333/1M.

Choose Google when...

  • you want model flexibility over lowest average price.
  • you want Google's lowest-cost model (Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite) for budget-sensitive traffic.
  • your workload fits Google's stronger coverage in flagship, efficient.

Tradeoff: Google is pricier on average than Meta (via Together AI).

Choose Meta (via Together AI) when...

  • you want lower average token pricing.
  • you want Meta (via Together AI)'s lowest-cost model (Llama 3.1 8B) for budget-sensitive traffic.
  • your workload fits Meta (via Together AI)'s stronger coverage in balanced.

Tradeoff: Google has premium models that may offer broader capabilities.

Coverage snapshot: Google supports 2/4 major categories and Meta (via Together AI) supports 3/4.

Category Breakdown

Providerflagshipreasoningbalancedefficient
Google3006
Meta (via Together AI)2012

All Models & Pricing

ModelCategoryInputOutputContext
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Liteefficient$0.075/1M$0.30/1M1,000,000
Gemini Embedding 2embedding$0.20/1M$0.20/1M8,192
Gemini 2.0 Flashefficient$0.10/1M$0.40/1M1,000,000
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Liteefficient$0.10/1M$0.40/1M1,000,000
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Previewefficient$0.25/1M$1.50/1M1,000,000
Gemini 2.5 Flashefficient$0.30/1M$2.50/1M1,000,000
Gemini 3 Flashefficient$0.50/1M$3.00/1M1,000,000
Gemini 2.5 Proflagship$1.25/1M$10.00/1M2,000,000
Gemini 3.1 Proflagship$2.00/1M$12.00/1M1,000,000
Gemini 3 Proflagship$2.00/1M$12.00/1M2,000,000

Meta (via Together AI)

Provider details →
ModelCategoryInputOutputContext
Llama 3.1 8Befficient$0.18/1M$0.18/1M128,000
Llama 4 Scoutefficient$0.08/1M$0.30/1M10,000,000
Llama 4 Maverickflagship$0.27/1M$0.85/1M1,000,000
Llama 3.3 70Bstandard$0.88/1M$0.88/1M131,072
Llama 3.1 70Bbalanced$0.88/1M$0.88/1M128,000
Llama 3.1 405Bflagship$3.50/1M$3.50/1M128,000

Cross-Provider Model Matchups

Browse all model comparisons →

Showing 12 of 60 matchups between Google and Meta (via Together AI).

Get started with Google

Sign Up for Google

Get started with Meta (via Together AI)

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is cheaper on average, Google or Meta (via Together AI)?
On average, Meta (via Together AI) has lower combined input + output rates. Compare model-specific pricing to match your workload.
What is the cheapest model across Google and Meta (via Together AI)?
Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI)) is the lowest-cost option at $0.18 input and $0.18 output per million tokens.
Which model is the most expensive between these providers?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) is the highest-cost model in this comparison at $2.00 input and $12.00 output per million tokens.
Which provider has more models available?
Google offers more models in this dataset.