Skip to main content

Gemini 3.8 Live vs Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing verdict: Gemini 3.8 Live vs Llama 3.1 405B: Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.75/M vs $3.50/M input tokens), while Gemini 3.8 Live is better for long-context tasks (131,072 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.8 Live for lower token spend and choose Gemini 3.8 Live when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Live
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.8 Live

Per Request:$0.003000
Daily:$0.30
Monthly:$9.00
Yearly:$109.50

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.002250
Per Request
+$0.225
Daily
+$6.75
Monthly
+$82.125
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs more than Gemini 3.8 Live

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.8 LiveLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.75/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$4.50/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window131,072 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoreasoningstreaming
textcodereasoning
Release Date9/15/20267/23/2024

Gemini 3.8 Live vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.8 Live and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.8 Live is the more affordable option at $0.75/1M input tokens — 79% cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B. Meanwhile, Gemini 3.8 Live offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.8 Live is a balanced model while Llama 3.1 405B is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 405B targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini 3.8 Live provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.8 Live charges $4.50/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 3.8 Live supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.8 Live when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, streaming)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 3.8 Live

  • Input pricing: $0.75/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.8 Live
  • Smaller context window than Gemini 3.8 Live

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.8 Live (Google)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini 3.8 Live today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Live or Llama 3.1 405B?
Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input tokens at $0.75 per million tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B — that's 79% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.8 Live and Llama 3.1 405B?
Gemini 3.8 Live supports 131,072 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Gemini 3.8 Live.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini 3.8 Live is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 3.8 Live offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.8 Live for budget sensitivity or Gemini 3.8 Live for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.8 Live costs about $9.00/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Gemini 3.8 Live has lower combined input + output rates ($0.75 in, $4.50 out) vs Llama 3.1 405B.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.