Codex Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Compare OpenAI and Google AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Codex Mini
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cost Differences
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less than Codex Mini
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Codex Mini | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $6.00/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | efficient | efficient |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textvisionaudiocode |
| Release Date | 2/2/2026 | 5/20/2025 |
Codex Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Codex Mini and Gemini 2.5 Flash depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens — 80% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Gemini 2.5 Flash offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Codex Mini.
These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Google — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Googleinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Gemini 2.5 Flash would save you roughly $885.00/month compared to Codex Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $2.50 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the edge here at $2.50/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Codex Mini when:
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision, audio)
- • You're already using Google's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Codex Mini (OpenAI)
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google)
Start using Codex Mini today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Start using Gemini 2.5 Flash today
Sign Up for Google →