Skip to main content

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B: Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.25/M vs $3.50/M input tokens), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for long-context tasks (2,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 2.5 Pro for lower token spend and choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.001000
Per Request
$0.10
Daily
$3.00
Monthly
$36.50
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs less than Gemini 2.5 Pro

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 3.1 405B. At the default workload, Llama 3.1 405B saves about $3.00/month ($36.50/year) versus Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideocode
textcodereasoning
Release Date3/25/20257/23/2024

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 405B is the more affordable option at $3.50/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Gemini 2.5 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 405B would save you roughly $300.00/month compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 2.5 Pro charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 2.5 Pro

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 2.5 Pro
  • Smaller context window than Gemini 2.5 Pro

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini 2.5 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input tokens at $3.50 per million tokens vs $1.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 2,000,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 1,872,000 tokens in favor of Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 405B is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 2.5 Pro offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for budget sensitivity or Gemini 2.5 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 2.5 Pro costs about $18.75/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.