Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 5 vs o4-mini Deep Research

Pricing verdict: Claude Sonnet 5 vs o4-mini Deep Research: input pricing is tied at $2.00/M, o4-mini Deep Research is cheaper for output-heavy usage ($8.00/M output), and Claude Sonnet 5 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: input pricing is tied. Choose o4-mini Deep Research for cheaper output and choose Claude Sonnet 5 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 5

Per Request:$0.007000
Daily:$0.70
Monthly:$21.00
Yearly:$255.50

o4-mini Deep Research

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

$0.001000
Per Request
$0.10
Daily
$3.00
Monthly
$36.50
Yearly

o4-mini Deep Research costs less than Claude Sonnet 5

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: o4-mini Deep Research. At the default workload, o4-mini Deep Research saves about $3.00/month ($36.50/year) versus Claude Sonnet 5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 5o4-mini Deep Research
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoningcomputer-use
textreasoningcode
Release Date6/30/20266/26/2025

Claude Sonnet 5 vs o4-mini Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 5 and o4-mini Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models charge $2.00/1M input tokens, but o4-mini Deep Research is cheaper on output at $8.00/1M. Meanwhile, Claude Sonnet 5 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o4-mini Deep Research.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 5 is a balanced model while o4-mini Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o4-mini Deep Research targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 5 charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o4-mini Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o4-mini Deep Research has the edge here at $8.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Sonnet 5 supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini Deep Research is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, computer-use)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o4-mini Deep Research when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Sonnet 5

  • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than o4-mini Deep Research

o4-mini Deep Research

  • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $8.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Claude Sonnet 5

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)

o4-mini Deep Research (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o4-mini Deep Research today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or o4-mini Deep Research?
Input pricing is tied at $2.00 per million tokens. o4-mini Deep Research is cheaper on output at $8.00 vs $10.00 for Claude Sonnet 5, so it wins for output-heavy usage.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 5 and o4-mini Deep Research?
Claude Sonnet 5 supports 1,000,000 tokens while o4-mini Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Claude Sonnet 5.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, o4-mini Deep Research is the lower-cost option, while Claude Sonnet 5 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o4-mini Deep Research for budget sensitivity or Claude Sonnet 5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 5 costs about $21.00/month and o4-mini Deep Research costs about $18.00/month. Overall, o4-mini Deep Research has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $8.00 out) vs Claude Sonnet 5.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.