Llama 3.1 70B vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Llama 3.1 70B
Mistral Medium 3.1
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs more than Llama 3.1 70B
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Llama 3.1 70B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta (via Together AI) | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.88/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.88/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Category | balanced | balanced |
| Capabilities | textcode | textcodereasoning |
| Release Date | 7/23/2024 | 8/1/2025 |
Llama 3.1 70B vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Llama 3.1 70B and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 70B.
These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the balanced category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 70B would save you roughly $24.00/month compared to Mistral Medium 3.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose Llama 3.1 70B when:
- • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Llama 3.1 70B (Meta (via Together AI))
Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)
Start using Llama 3.1 70B today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →