Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.003100
Per Request
$0.31
Daily
$9.30
Monthly
$113.15
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientbalanced
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date2/2/20268/1/2025

Codex Mini vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens73% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3.1.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 73% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 68,928 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles