Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 405B

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.004300
Per Request
+$0.43
Daily
+$12.90
Monthly
+$156.95
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs more than Grok Code Fast 1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Llama 3.1 405B
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorystandardflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date2/1/20267/23/2024

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens94% cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Llama 3.1 405B is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 405B targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 3.1 405B?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B — that's 94% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.1 405B?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Llama 3.1 405B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles