Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs Grok 3

Compare OpenAI and xAI AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
xAI
Grok 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Grok 3

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Cost Differences

+$0.006000
Per Request
+$0.60
Daily
+$18.00
Monthly
+$219.00
Yearly

Grok 3 costs more than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniGrok 3
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$3.00/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisionreasoningcode
Release Date2/2/20262/17/2025

Codex Mini vs Grok 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and Grok 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codex Mini is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Grok 3. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Grok 3.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Grok 3 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 3 targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $15.00 for Grok 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codex Mini has the edge here at $6.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Grok 3 supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Grok 3 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Grok 3 (xAI)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Grok 3 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Grok 3?
Codex Mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Grok 3 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Grok 3?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while Grok 3 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 68,928 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Codex Mini is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Codex Mini for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and Grok 3 costs about $31.50/month. Overall, Codex Mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $6.00 out) vs Grok 3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles