Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Grok 4.20 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Grok 4.20 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.25/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Grok 4.20 is better for long-context tasks (2,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Grok 4.20 for lower token spend and choose Grok 4.20 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

xAI
Grok 4.20
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.20

Per Request:$0.002500
Daily:$0.25
Monthly:$7.50
Yearly:$91.25

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.002750
Per Request
+$0.275
Daily
+$8.25
Monthly
+$100.375
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Grok 4.20

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Grok 4.20. At the default workload, Grok 4.20 saves about $8.25/month ($100.375/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.20Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$2.50/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryreasoningflagship
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date2/17/20264/29/2026

Grok 4.20 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.20 and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 4.20 is the more affordable option at $1.25/1M input tokens17% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. Meanwhile, Grok 4.20 offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 4.20 is a reasoning model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4.20 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.20 charges $2.50/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 4.20 has the edge here at $2.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.20 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Grok 4.20

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $2.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Grok 4.20
  • Higher output cost than Grok 4.20
  • Smaller context window than Grok 4.20

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.20 (xAI)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Grok 4.20 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Grok 4.20 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.25 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5 — that's 17% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.20 and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Grok 4.20 supports 2,000,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 1,744,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.20.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok 4.20 is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.20 offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Grok 4.20 for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.20 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.20 costs about $7.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Grok 4.20 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.25 in, $2.50 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.5.
Where can I compare xAI and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the xAI vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.