Codex Mini vs Magistral Medium
Pricing verdict: Codex Mini vs Magistral Medium: Codex Mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $2.00/M input tokens), while Codex Mini is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Codex Mini for lower token spend and choose Codex Mini when your workload needs longer context.
Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Codex Mini
Magistral Medium
Cost Differences
Both models cost the same at the default workload.
Quick Recommendation
Direct API pricing is a tie at the default workload: both land around $13.50/month. Pick Codex Mini if you need the larger 200K context window; otherwise choose the model that better fits your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Codex Mini | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $6.00/1M tokens | $5.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | efficient | reasoning |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textreasoning |
| Release Date | 2/2/2026 | 12/15/2025 |
Codex Mini vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Codex Mini and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codex Mini is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens — 25% cheaper than Magistral Medium. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.
These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Magistral Medium targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose Codex Mini when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (code)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Magistral Medium when:
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Codex Mini
- • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $6.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 200,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher output cost than Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium
- • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $5.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 128,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Codex Mini
- • Smaller context window than Codex Mini
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Codex Mini (OpenAI)
Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)
Start using Codex Mini today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Start using Magistral Medium today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Magistral Medium?▼
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Magistral Medium?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Where can I compare OpenAI and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.