Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs Magistral Medium

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.00
Per Request
$0.00
Daily
$0.00
Monthly
$0.00
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs less than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date2/2/202612/15/2025

Codex Mini vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Magistral Medium targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Magistral Medium?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Medium is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Medium for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Magistral Medium has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $5.00 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles