Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Magistral Medium

Compare xAI and Mistral AI AI models

xAI
Grok 4.20
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.20

Per Request:$0.005000
Daily:$0.50
Monthly:$15.00
Yearly:$182.50

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.000500
Per Request
$0.05
Daily
$1.50
Monthly
$18.25
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs less than Grok 4.20

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.20Magistral Medium
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryreasoningreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textreasoning
Release Date2/17/202612/15/2025

Grok 4.20 vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.20 and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Grok 4.20 offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Magistral Medium would save you roughly $150.00/month compared to Grok 4.20. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.20 charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Grok 4.20 supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Medium is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.20 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.20 (xAI)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using Grok 4.20 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $2.00 for Grok 4.20.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.20 and Magistral Medium?
Grok 4.20 supports 2,000,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 1,872,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.20.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Medium is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.20 offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Medium for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.20 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.20 costs about $15.00/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Magistral Medium has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $5.00 out) vs Grok 4.20.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles