Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok 4.20
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.20

Per Request:$0.005000
Daily:$0.50
Monthly:$15.00
Yearly:$182.50

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.004305
Per Request
$0.4305
Daily
$12.915
Monthly
$157.1325
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than Grok 4.20

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.20Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningflagship
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisioncode
Release Date2/17/20264/5/2025

Grok 4.20 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.20 and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens87% cheaper than Grok 4.20. Meanwhile, Grok 4.20 offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Llama 4 Maverick.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 4.20 is a reasoning model while Llama 4 Maverick is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4.20 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Maverick offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.20 charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.20 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.20 (xAI)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok 4.20 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $2.00 for Grok 4.20 — that's 87% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.20 and Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 4.20 supports 2,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,000,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.20.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.20 offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.20 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.20 costs about $15.00/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs Grok 4.20.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles