Skip to main content

GPT-5 vs Magistral Medium

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.001750
Per Request
$0.175
Daily
$5.25
Monthly
$63.875
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs less than GPT-5

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5Magistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocode
textreasoning
Release Date8/7/202512/15/2025

GPT-5 vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5 and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, GPT-5 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5 is a flagship model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Magistral Medium offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5 charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5 supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Medium is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5 (OpenAI)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5 and Magistral Medium?
GPT-5 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Medium is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Medium for budget sensitivity or GPT-5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5 costs about $18.75/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Magistral Medium has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $5.00 out) vs GPT-5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles