Skip to main content

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Llama 3.1 405B: GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.00/M vs $3.50/M input tokens), while GPT-5.6 Luna is better for long-context tasks (1,050,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-5.6 Luna for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.6 Luna when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.6 Luna

Per Request:$0.004000
Daily:$0.40
Monthly:$12.00
Yearly:$146.00

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.001250
Per Request
+$0.125
Daily
+$3.75
Monthly
+$45.625
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs more than GPT-5.6 Luna

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.6 LunaLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,050,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date6/26/20267/23/2024

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.6 Luna and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.6 Luna is the more affordable option at $1.00/1M input tokens — 71% cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B. Meanwhile, GPT-5.6 Luna offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.6 Luna is a efficient model while Llama 3.1 405B is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 405B targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.6 Luna provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.6 Luna charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.6 Luna supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-5.6 Luna

  • Input pricing: $1.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $6.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-5.6 Luna
  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.6 Luna

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.6 Luna today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Llama 3.1 405B?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper for input tokens at $1.00 per million tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B — that's 71% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.6 Luna and Llama 3.1 405B?
GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1,050,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 922,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.6 Luna.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning, and direct token pricing is tied. For ai agent / agentic workflows, start with GPT-5.6 Luna if you need the larger 1,050,000-token context window; otherwise choose the model whose provider, tools, or latency profile fits better.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.6 Luna costs about $12.00/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs GPT-5.6 Luna.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.