Skip to main content

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B: Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.88/M vs $5.00/M input tokens), while GPT-5.5 is better for long-context tasks (1,050,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 70B for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.5 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B • GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B pricing • GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B API pricing and 5 5 vs 3 1 70b pricing.

OpenAI
GPT-5.5
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.5

Per Request:$0.02
Daily:$2.00
Monthly:$60.00
Yearly:$730.00

Llama 3.1 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

$0.01868
Per Request
$1.868
Daily
$56.04
Monthly
$681.82
Yearly

Llama 3.1 70B costs less than GPT-5.5

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 3.1 70B. At the default workload, Llama 3.1 70B saves about $56.04/month ($681.82/year) versus GPT-5.5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.5Llama 3.1 70B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$5.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$30.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window1,050,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipbalanced
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textcode
Release Date4/24/20267/23/2024

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.5 and Llama 3.1 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens82% cheaper than GPT-5.5. Meanwhile, GPT-5.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 70B.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.5 is a flagship model while Llama 3.1 70B is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.5 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 3.1 70B offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.5 charges $30.00/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.1 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.5 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 70B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-5.5

  • Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $30.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 70B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 70B

Llama 3.1 70B

  • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.5

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)

Llama 3.1 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.5 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.1 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or Llama 3.1 70B?
Llama 3.1 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $5.00 for GPT-5.5 — that's 82% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.5 and Llama 3.1 70B?
GPT-5.5 supports 1,050,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 70B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 922,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 70B is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.5 offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 70B for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.5 costs about $60.00/month and Llama 3.1 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs GPT-5.5.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.