Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 nano vs Magistral Medium

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.4 nano

Per Request:$0.000825
Daily:$0.0825
Monthly:$2.475
Yearly:$30.1125

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

+$0.003675
Per Request
+$0.3675
Daily
+$11.025
Monthly
+$134.1375
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs more than GPT-5.4 nano

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.4 nanoMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$1.25/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
text
textreasoning
Release Date3/6/202612/15/2025

GPT-5.4 nano vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.4 nano and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.4 nano is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens90% cheaper than Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.4 nano is a efficient model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Magistral Medium targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.4 nano provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.4 nano charges $1.25/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.4 nano has the edge here at $1.25/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.4 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.4 nano (OpenAI)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.4 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano or Magistral Medium?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $2.00 for Magistral Medium — that's 90% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.4 nano and Magistral Medium?
GPT-5.4 nano supports 128,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of GPT-5.4 nano.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.4 nano is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.4 nano offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.4 nano for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.4 nano for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.4 nano costs about $2.475/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, GPT-5.4 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.25 out) vs Magistral Medium.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles