Skip to main content

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Mistral Medium 3

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Mistral Medium 3

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.007350
Per Request
$0.735
Daily
$22.05
Monthly
$268.275
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3 costs less than GPT-5.3 Codex

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexMistral Medium 3
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Categorycodingbalanced
Capabilities
textcode
textcode
Release Date3/1/20265/7/2025

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Mistral Medium 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.3 Codex and Mistral Medium 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens77% cheaper than GPT-5.3 Codex. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Medium 3.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.3 Codex is a coding model while Mistral Medium 3 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.3 Codex provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.3 Codex charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Mistral Medium 3?
Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.3 Codex — that's 77% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.3 Codex and Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.3 Codex.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Medium 3 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.3 Codex for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month and Mistral Medium 3 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs GPT-5.3 Codex.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles