Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Codex Mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
vs
OpenAI
Codex Mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.006000
Per Request
$0.60
Daily
$18.00
Monthly
$219.00
Yearly

Codex Mini costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5Codex Mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$6.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textcodereasoning
Release Date9/29/20252/2/2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Codex Mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Codex Mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codex Mini is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a balanced model while Codex Mini is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Codex Mini targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $6.00 for Codex Mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codex Mini has the edge here at $6.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when:

  • • You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Codex Mini?
Codex Mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Codex Mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codex Mini is the lower-cost option, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Codex Mini for budget sensitivity or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.50/month and Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Codex Mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $6.00 out) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles