Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs Magistral Small

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Small

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Magistral Small

Per Request:$0.001250
Daily:$0.125
Monthly:$3.75
Yearly:$45.625

Cost Differences

$0.007500
Per Request
$0.75
Daily
$22.50
Monthly
$273.75
Yearly

Magistral Small costs less than GPT-5.2

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2Magistral Small
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date12/11/202512/15/2025

GPT-5.2 vs Magistral Small: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 and Magistral Small depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Small is the more affordable option at $0.50/1M input tokens71% cheaper than GPT-5.2. Meanwhile, GPT-5.2 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Small.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.2 is a flagship model while Magistral Small is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.2 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Magistral Small offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Magistral Small. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Small has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.2 supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Small is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Small when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

Magistral Small (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.2 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Small today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Magistral Small?
Magistral Small is cheaper for input tokens at $0.50 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — that's 71% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 and Magistral Small?
GPT-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Magistral Small supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Small is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Small for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 costs about $26.25/month and Magistral Small costs about $3.75/month. Overall, Magistral Small has lower combined input + output rates ($0.50 in, $1.50 out) vs GPT-5.2.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles