Skip to main content

GPT-5.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.005555
Per Request
$0.5555
Daily
$16.665
Monthly
$202.7575
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than GPT-5.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date11/12/20254/5/2025

GPT-5.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens78% cheaper than GPT-5.1.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Maverick would save you roughly $1,666.50/month compared to GPT-5.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.1 charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (audio, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1 — that's 78% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.1 and Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs GPT-5.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles