Skip to main content

GPT-5.1 vs Llama 3.1 8B

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.005980
Per Request
$0.598
Daily
$17.94
Monthly
$218.27
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than GPT-5.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1Llama 3.1 8B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textcode
Release Date11/12/20257/23/2024

GPT-5.1 vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.1 and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens86% cheaper than GPT-5.1. Meanwhile, GPT-5.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 8B.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.1 is a flagship model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.1 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 3.1 8B offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.1 charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.1 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 8B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1 — that's 86% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.1 and Llama 3.1 8B?
GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs GPT-5.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles