Skip to main content

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick: Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.27/M vs $2.50/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Maverick for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Maverick when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

OpenAI
GPT-4o
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4o

Per Request:$0.007500
Daily:$0.75
Monthly:$22.50
Yearly:$273.75

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.006805
Per Request
$0.6805
Daily
$20.415
Monthly
$248.3825
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than GPT-4o

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Maverick. At the default workload, Llama 4 Maverick saves about $20.415/month ($248.3825/year) versus GPT-4o.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4oLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$2.50/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudio
textvisioncode
Release Date5/13/20244/5/2025

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens89% cheaper than GPT-4o. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Maverick would save you roughly $2,041.50/month compared to GPT-4o. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4o charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4o when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-4o

  • Input pricing: $2.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 16,384 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick

  • Input pricing: $0.27/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.85/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4o (OpenAI)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-4o today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $2.50 for GPT-4o — that's 89% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-4o supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4o costs about $22.50/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs GPT-4o.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.