Skip to main content

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Maverick

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: GPT-4o mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.15/M vs $0.27/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-4o mini for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Maverick when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4o mini

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

+$0.000245
Per Request
+$0.0245
Daily
+$0.735
Monthly
+$8.9425
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs more than GPT-4o mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o miniLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$0.60/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncode
Release Date7/18/20244/5/2025

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4o mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens44% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o mini.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-4o mini is a efficient model while Llama 4 Maverick is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Maverick targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-4o mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4o mini charges $0.60/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4o mini has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4o mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-4o mini

  • Input pricing: $0.15/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.60/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 16,384 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick

  • Input pricing: $0.27/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.85/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-4o mini
  • Higher output cost than GPT-4o mini

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-4o mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $0.27 for Llama 4 Maverick — that's 44% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-4o mini supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4o mini is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4o mini for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4o mini costs about $1.35/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, GPT-4o mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs Llama 4 Maverick.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.