Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 nano vs Llama 3.1 8B

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4.1 nano

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.000030
Per Request
$0.003000
Daily
$0.09
Monthly
$1.095
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than GPT-4.1 nano

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 8B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$0.40/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
text
textcode
Release Date4/14/20257/23/2024

GPT-4.1 nano vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 8B would save you roughly $9.00/month compared to GPT-4.1 nano. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4.1 nano charges $0.40/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-4.1 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $0.10 for GPT-4.1 nano.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 8B?
GPT-4.1 nano supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of GPT-4.1 nano.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while GPT-4.1 nano offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or GPT-4.1 nano for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4.1 nano costs about $0.90/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs GPT-4.1 nano.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles