Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-5.1

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4.1 nano

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Cost Differences

+$0.005950
Per Request
+$0.595
Daily
+$17.85
Monthly
+$217.175
Yearly

GPT-5.1 costs more than GPT-4.1 nano

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 nanoGPT-5.1
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$0.10/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$0.40/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
text
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date4/14/202511/12/2025

GPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-5.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4.1 nano and GPT-5.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens92% cheaper than GPT-5.1. Meanwhile, GPT-5.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.

These models target different tiers: GPT-4.1 nano is a efficient model while GPT-5.1 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.1 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-4.1 nano provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4.1 nano charges $0.40/1M output tokens vs $10.00 for GPT-5.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.1 supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-4.1 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Start using GPT-4.1 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or GPT-5.1?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.10 per million tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1 — that's 92% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4.1 nano and GPT-5.1?
GPT-4.1 nano supports 128,000 tokens while GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4.1 nano is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4.1 nano for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4.1 nano costs about $0.90/month and GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.10 in, $0.40 out) vs GPT-5.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles