Skip to main content

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing verdict: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick: Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.27/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is better for long-context tasks (1,048,576 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Maverick for lower token spend and choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Google
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Per Request:$0.01025
Daily:$1.025
Monthly:$30.75
Yearly:$374.125

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.009555
Per Request
$0.9555
Daily
$28.665
Monthly
$348.7575
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Maverick. At the default workload, Llama 4 Maverick saves about $28.665/month ($348.7575/year) versus Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$17.50/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output57,920 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideo
textvisioncode
Release Date8/27/20264/5/2025

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens — 82% cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. Meanwhile, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a significantly larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Llama 4 Maverick.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Maverick would save you roughly $2,866.50/month compared to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash charges $17.50/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (audio, video)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $17.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Max output: 57,920 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick

  • Input pricing: $0.27/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.85/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash — that's 82% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 48,576 tokens in favor of Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a larger context window (1,048,576 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash costs about $30.75/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.