Skip to main content

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 8B

Pricing verdict: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 8B: Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.18/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is better for long-context tasks (1,048,576 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 8B for lower token spend and choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Google
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Per Request:$0.01025
Daily:$1.025
Monthly:$30.75
Yearly:$374.125

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.009980
Per Request
$0.998
Daily
$29.94
Monthly
$364.27
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 3.1 8B. At the default workload, Llama 3.1 8B saves about $29.94/month ($364.27/year) versus Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 3.1 8B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$17.50/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window1,048,576 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output57,920 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideo
textcode
Release Date8/27/20267/23/2024

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens — 88% cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. Meanwhile, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a significantly larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 8B.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is a flagship model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 3.1 8B offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash charges $17.50/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 8B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 57,920 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $17.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Max output: 57,920 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 8B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 8B

Llama 3.1 8B

  • Input pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash — that's 88% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B?
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 920,576 tokens in favor of Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a larger context window (1,048,576 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash costs about $30.75/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.