Skip to main content

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.3 70B

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.3 70B: Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.20/M vs $0.88/M input tokens), while Llama 3.3 70B is better for long-context tasks (131,072 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini Embedding 2 for lower token spend and choose Llama 3.3 70B when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini Embedding 2
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Embedding 2

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

+$0.001020
Per Request
+$0.102
Daily
+$3.06
Monthly
+$37.23
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs more than Gemini Embedding 2

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini Embedding 2. At the default workload, Gemini Embedding 2 saves about $3.06/month ($37.23/year) versus Llama 3.3 70B.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Embedding 2Llama 3.3 70B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window8,192 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output3,072 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryembeddingstandard
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoembeddings
textcode
Release Date3/10/202612/6/2024

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Embedding 2 and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini Embedding 2 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens77% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B. Meanwhile, Llama 3.3 70B offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 8,192 for Gemini Embedding 2.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini Embedding 2 is a embedding model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini Embedding 2 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Embedding 2 charges $0.20/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini Embedding 2 has the edge here at $0.20/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Embedding 2 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.3 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Embedding 2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, embeddings)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 4,096 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Embedding 2

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Context window: 8,192 tokens
  • Max output: 3,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Llama 3.3 70B

Llama 3.3 70B

  • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 4,096 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini Embedding 2
  • Higher output cost than Gemini Embedding 2

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Embedding 2 (Google)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini Embedding 2 today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Embedding 2 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B — that's 77% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Embedding 2 and Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8,192 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 122,880 tokens in favor of Llama 3.3 70B.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini Embedding 2 is the lower-cost option, while Llama 3.3 70B offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 8,192 tokens). Choose Gemini Embedding 2 for budget sensitivity or Llama 3.3 70B for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Embedding 2 costs about $0.90/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Gemini Embedding 2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.20 out) vs Llama 3.3 70B.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.