Skip to main content

Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B

Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B: Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.50/M vs $0.88/M input tokens), while Gemini 3 Flash is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3 Flash for lower token spend and choose Gemini 3 Flash when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3 Flash

Per Request:$0.002000
Daily:$0.20
Monthly:$6.00
Yearly:$73.00

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

$0.000680
Per Request
$0.068
Daily
$2.04
Monthly
$24.82
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs less than Gemini 3 Flash

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 FlashLlama 3.3 70B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.50/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$3.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryefficientstandard
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocode
textcode
Release Date12/17/202512/6/2024

Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Gemini 3 Flash offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini 3 Flash is a efficient model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini 3 Flash provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3 Flash charges $3.00/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.3 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 3 Flash supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.3 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3 Flash when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 3 Flash

  • Input pricing: $0.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.3 70B

Llama 3.3 70B

  • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 4,096 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3 Flash
  • Smaller context window than Gemini 3 Flash

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3 Flash (Google)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini 3 Flash today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $0.50 for Gemini 3 Flash.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 868,928 tokens in favor of Gemini 3 Flash.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.3 70B is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 3 Flash offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 3.3 70B for budget sensitivity or Gemini 3 Flash for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3 Flash costs about $6.00/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs Gemini 3 Flash.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.