Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1 8B

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1 8B: Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.18/M vs $2.00/M input tokens), while Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 8B for lower token spend and choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Per Request:$0.008000
Daily:$0.80
Monthly:$24.00
Yearly:$292.00

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.007730
Per Request
$0.773
Daily
$23.19
Monthly
$282.145
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 ProLlama 3.1 8B
ProviderGoogleMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$12.00/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
textcode
Release Date2/19/20267/23/2024

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens91% cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro. Meanwhile, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 8B.

These models come from different providers — Google and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.1 Pro is a flagship model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini 3.1 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 3.1 8B offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $12.00/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 8B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $12.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 8B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 8B

Llama 3.1 8B

  • Input pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.18/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Gemini 3.1 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $2.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro — that's 91% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Llama 3.1 8B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Gemini 3.1 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs about $24.00/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Where can I compare Google and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.