Skip to main content

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.27/M vs $0.28/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Maverick for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Maverick when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 V3.2
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Per Request:$0.000490
Daily:$0.049
Monthly:$1.47
Yearly:$17.885

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

+$0.000205
Per Request
+$0.0205
Daily
+$0.615
Monthly
+$7.4825
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs more than DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: DeepSeek R1 V3.2. At the default workload, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 saves about $0.615/month ($7.4825/year) versus Llama 4 Maverick.

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1 V3.2Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderDeepSeekMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.28/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$0.42/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningflagship
Capabilities
textreasoningcode
textvisioncode
Release Date1/20/20254/5/2025

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between DeepSeek R1 V3.2 and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is the more affordable option at $0.28/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for DeepSeek R1 V3.2.

These models come from different providers — DeepSeek and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with DeepSeek, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is a reasoning model while Llama 4 Maverick is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Maverick offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 charges $0.42/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 has the edge here at $0.42/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs) while DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose DeepSeek R1 V3.2 when:

  • • You're already using DeepSeek's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

DeepSeek R1 V3.2

  • Input pricing: $0.28/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.42/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick

  • Input pricing: $0.27/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.85/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 (DeepSeek)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using DeepSeek R1 V3.2 today

Sign Up for DeepSeek

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 or Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.28 per million tokens vs $0.27 for Llama 4 Maverick.
What is the context window difference between DeepSeek R1 V3.2 and Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek R1 V3.2 supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose DeepSeek R1 V3.2 for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 costs about $1.47/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.28 in, $0.42 out) vs Llama 4 Maverick.
Where can I compare DeepSeek and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the DeepSeek vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.