Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Compare OpenAI and DeepSeek AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

DeepSeek R1 V3.2

Per Request:$0.000490
Daily:$0.049
Monthly:$1.47
Yearly:$17.885

Cost Differences

$0.004010
Per Request
$0.401
Daily
$12.03
Monthly
$146.365
Yearly

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 costs less than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniDeepSeek R1 V3.2
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.28/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$0.42/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date2/2/20261/20/2025

Codex Mini vs DeepSeek R1 V3.2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and DeepSeek R1 V3.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is the more affordable option at $0.28/1M input tokens81% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for DeepSeek R1 V3.2.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and DeepSeek — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to DeepSeekinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $0.42 for DeepSeek R1 V3.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. DeepSeek R1 V3.2 has the edge here at $0.42/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose DeepSeek R1 V3.2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using DeepSeek's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

DeepSeek R1 V3.2 (DeepSeek)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using DeepSeek R1 V3.2 today

Sign Up for DeepSeek

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or DeepSeek R1 V3.2?
DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.28 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 81% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and DeepSeek R1 V3.2?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while DeepSeek R1 V3.2 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose DeepSeek R1 V3.2 for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and DeepSeek R1 V3.2 costs about $1.47/month. Overall, DeepSeek R1 V3.2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.28 in, $0.42 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles