Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Compare Anthropic and xAI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Grok Code Fast 1
Cost Differences
Grok Code Fast 1 costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.6
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok Code Fast 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Input Price | $3.00/1M tokens | $0.20/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $15.00/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 65,536 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | balanced | standard |
| Capabilities | textvisioncodereasoningcomputer-use | textcodereasoning |
| Release Date | 2/18/2026 | 2/1/2026 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens — 93% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Meanwhile, Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is a balanced model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok Code Fast 1 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when:
- • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision, computer-use)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic)
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)
Start using Claude Sonnet 4.6 today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today
Sign Up for xAI →