Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3 Deep Research

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
vs
OpenAI
o3 Deep Research

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

o3 Deep Research

Per Request:$0.03
Daily:$3.00
Monthly:$90.00
Yearly:$1,095.00

Cost Differences

+$0.0195
Per Request
+$1.95
Daily
+$58.50
Monthly
+$711.75
Yearly

o3 Deep Research costs more than Claude Sonnet 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5o3 Deep Research
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$40.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date9/29/20256/26/2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3 Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3 Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the more affordable option at $3.00/1M input tokens70% cheaper than o3 Deep Research.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a balanced model while o3 Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 Deep Research targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $40.00 for o3 Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge here at $15.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o3 Deep Research when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

o3 Deep Research (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o3 Deep Research today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o3 Deep Research?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $3.00 per million tokens vs $10.00 for o3 Deep Research — that's 70% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3 Deep Research?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while o3 Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 for budget sensitivity or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.50/month and o3 Deep Research costs about $90.00/month. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($3.00 in, $15.00 out) vs o3 Deep Research.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles