Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.08/M vs $3.00/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Scout is better for long-context tasks (10,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Scout for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Scout when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Meta (via Together AI)

Llama 4 Scout

Try Anthropic →Try Meta (via Together AI) →

Claude Sonnet 4.5 pricing page Llama 4 Scout pricing page Anthropic provider overview Meta (via Together AI) provider overview

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Per Request:$0.0105

Daily:$1.05

Monthly:$31.50

Yearly:$383.25

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230

Daily:$0.023

Monthly:$0.69

Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.01027

Per Request

$1.027

Daily

$30.81

Monthly

$374.855

Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.5

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Scout. At the default workload, Llama 4 Scout saves about $30.81/month ($374.855/year) versus Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 full pricing breakdown Llama 4 Scout full pricing breakdown Anthropic API pricing details Meta (via Together AI) API pricing details Anthropic vs Meta (via Together AI) API pricing Codex Mini vs Claude Opus 4.7 Codex Mini vs Claude Opus 4.6

Feature Comparison

Feature	Claude Sonnet 4.5	Llama 4 Scout
Provider	Anthropic	Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price	$3.00/1M tokens	$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price	$15.00/1M tokens	$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window	200,000 tokens	10,000,000 tokens
Max Output	64,000 tokens	32,768 tokens
Category	balanced	efficient
Capabilities	textvisioncode	textvisioncode
Release Date	9/29/2025	4/5/2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 97% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a balanced model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Scout targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when:

• You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
• You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
• You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
• You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Sonnet 4.5

• Input pricing: $3.00/M tokens
• Output pricing: $15.00/M tokens
• Context window: 200,000 tokens
• Max output: 64,000 tokens

Watch out for

• Higher input cost than Llama 4 Scout
• Higher output cost than Llama 4 Scout
• Smaller context window than Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

• Input pricing: $0.08/M tokens
• Output pricing: $0.30/M tokens
• Context window: 10,000,000 tokens
• Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

• Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.5 today

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Llama 4 Scout?▼

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 — that's 97% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout?▼

Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,800,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.50/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Where can I compare Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼

See the Anthropic vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.