Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4 vs Magistral Medium

Compare Anthropic and Mistral AI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.048
Per Request
$4.80
Daily
$144.00
Monthly
$1,752.00
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs less than Claude Opus 4

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4Magistral Medium
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date5/14/202512/15/2025

Claude Opus 4 vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4 and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens87% cheaper than Claude Opus 4. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4 is a flagship model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Magistral Medium offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Medium is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using Claude Opus 4 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4 — that's 87% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4 and Magistral Medium?
Claude Opus 4 supports 200,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Medium is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Medium for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4 costs about $157.50/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Magistral Medium has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $5.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles