Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Compare Anthropic and xAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

$0.05155
Per Request
$5.155
Daily
$154.65
Monthly
$1,881.575
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs less than Claude Opus 4

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4Grok Code Fast 1
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipstandard
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date5/14/20252/1/2026

Claude Opus 4 vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4 and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens99% cheaper than Claude Opus 4. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4 is a flagship model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4 — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4 and Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4 supports 200,000 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 56,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4 costs about $157.50/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Claude Opus 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles