Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research: Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($5.00/M vs $10.00/M input tokens), while Claude Opus 4.7 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Claude Opus 4.7 for lower token spend and choose Claude Opus 4.7 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research pricing • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research API pricing and opus 4 7 vs o3 deep research pricing.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

OpenAI

o3 Deep Research

Try Anthropic →Try OpenAI →

Claude Opus 4.7 pricing page o3 Deep Research pricing page Anthropic provider overview OpenAI provider overview

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.7

Per Request:$0.0175

Daily:$1.75

Monthly:$52.50

Yearly:$638.75

o3 Deep Research

Per Request:$0.03

Daily:$3.00

Monthly:$90.00

Yearly:$1,095.00

Cost Differences

+$0.0125

Per Request

+$1.25

Daily

+$37.50

Monthly

+$456.25

Yearly

o3 Deep Research costs more than Claude Opus 4.7

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Claude Opus 4.7. At the default workload, Claude Opus 4.7 saves about $37.50/month ($456.25/year) versus o3 Deep Research.

Claude Opus 4.7 full pricing breakdown o3 Deep Research full pricing breakdown Anthropic API pricing details OpenAI API pricing details Anthropic vs OpenAI API pricing Codex Mini vs o4-mini Deep Research Codex Mini vs o3 Deep Research

Feature Comparison

Feature	Claude Opus 4.7	o3 Deep Research
Provider	Anthropic	OpenAI
Input Price	$5.00/1M tokens	$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price	$25.00/1M tokens	$40.00/1M tokens
Context Window	1,000,000 tokens	200,000 tokens
Max Output	128,000 tokens	32,768 tokens
Category	flagship	reasoning
Capabilities	textvisionreasoningcode	textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date	4/16/2026	6/26/2025

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o3 Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and o3 Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Opus 4.7 is the more affordable option at $5.00/1M input tokens — 50% cheaper than o3 Deep Research. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4.7 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o3 Deep Research.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.7 is a flagship model while o3 Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.7 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o3 Deep Research offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $40.00 for o3 Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge here at $25.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
• You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
• You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o3 Deep Research when:

• You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Opus 4.7

• Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
• Output pricing: $25.00/M tokens
• Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
• Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

• Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

o3 Deep Research

• Input pricing: $10.00/M tokens
• Output pricing: $40.00/M tokens
• Context window: 200,000 tokens
• Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

• Higher input cost than Claude Opus 4.7
• Higher output cost than Claude Opus 4.7
• Smaller context window than Claude Opus 4.7

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

o3 Deep Research (OpenAI)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Claude Opus 4.7 today

Start using o3 Deep Research today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or o3 Deep Research?▼

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for input tokens at $5.00 per million tokens vs $10.00 for o3 Deep Research — that's 50% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and o3 Deep Research?▼

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000,000 tokens while o3 Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.7.

Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?▼

Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Claude Opus 4.7 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.7 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.7 for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.7 costs about $52.50/month and o3 Deep Research costs about $90.00/month. Overall, Claude Opus 4.7 has lower combined input + output rates ($5.00 in, $25.00 out) vs o3 Deep Research.

Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼

See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.