Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.1 vs o3 Deep Research

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
vs
OpenAI
o3 Deep Research

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.1

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

o3 Deep Research

Per Request:$0.03
Daily:$3.00
Monthly:$90.00
Yearly:$1,095.00

Cost Differences

$0.0225
Per Request
$2.25
Daily
$67.50
Monthly
$821.25
Yearly

o3 Deep Research costs less than Claude Opus 4.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1o3 Deep Research
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$40.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date8/5/20256/26/2025

Claude Opus 4.1 vs o3 Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.1 and o3 Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3 Deep Research is the more affordable option at $10.00/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.1 is a flagship model while o3 Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.1 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o3 Deep Research offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.1 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $40.00 for o3 Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3 Deep Research has the edge here at $40.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o3 Deep Research when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic)

o3 Deep Research (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o3 Deep Research today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or o3 Deep Research?
o3 Deep Research is cheaper for input tokens at $10.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and o3 Deep Research?
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200,000 tokens while o3 Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, o3 Deep Research is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.1 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o3 Deep Research for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.1 costs about $157.50/month and o3 Deep Research costs about $90.00/month. Overall, o3 Deep Research has lower combined input + output rates ($10.00 in, $40.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles