Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Compare Anthropic and Anthropic AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
vs
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.1

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Cost Differences

$0.042
Per Request
$4.20
Daily
$126.00
Monthly
$1,533.00
Yearly

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less than Claude Opus 4.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1Claude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$3.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipbalanced
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoningcomputer-use
Release Date8/5/20252/18/2026

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the more affordable option at $3.00/1M input tokens80% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1. Meanwhile, Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.1.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.1 is a flagship model while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.1 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.1 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge here at $15.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (computer-use)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic)

Start using Claude Opus 4.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.6 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper for input tokens at $3.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 — that's 80% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200,000 tokens while Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for budget sensitivity or Claude Sonnet 4.6 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.1 costs about $157.50/month and Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs about $31.50/month. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has lower combined input + output rates ($3.00 in, $15.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles