Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Compare Anthropic and Anthropic AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
vs
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.1

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Claude Opus 4.6

Per Request:$0.0175
Daily:$1.75
Monthly:$52.50
Yearly:$638.75

Cost Differences

$0.035
Per Request
$3.50
Daily
$105.00
Monthly
$1,277.50
Yearly

Claude Opus 4.6 costs less than Claude Opus 4.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1Claude Opus 4.6
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$25.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisionreasoningcode
Release Date8/5/20252/5/2026

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.6: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Opus 4.6 is the more affordable option at $5.00/1M input tokens67% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4.6 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.1.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Claude Opus 4.6 would save you roughly $10,500.00/month compared to Claude Opus 4.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.1 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $25.00 for Claude Opus 4.6. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge here at $25.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic)

Start using Claude Opus 4.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Claude Opus 4.6 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper for input tokens at $5.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 — that's 67% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200,000 tokens while Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.6.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Claude Opus 4.6 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.6 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.6 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.1 costs about $157.50/month and Claude Opus 4.6 costs about $52.50/month. Overall, Claude Opus 4.6 has lower combined input + output rates ($5.00 in, $25.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles