Skip to main content

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout

Pricing verdict: Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.08/M vs $10.00/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Scout is better for long-context tasks (10,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Scout for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Scout when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Mythos 5.1

Per Request:$0.035
Daily:$3.50
Monthly:$105.00
Yearly:$1,277.50

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.03477
Per Request
$3.477
Daily
$104.31
Monthly
$1,269.105
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Claude Mythos 5.1

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Scout. At the default workload, Llama 4 Scout saves about $104.31/month ($1,269.105/year) versus Claude Mythos 5.1.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Mythos 5.1Llama 4 Scout
ProviderAnthropicMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$10.00/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$50.00/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisioncode
Release Date9/1/20264/5/2025

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 99% cheaper than Claude Mythos 5.1. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Claude Mythos 5.1.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Mythos 5.1 is a flagship model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Mythos 5.1 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Scout offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Mythos 5.1 charges $50.00/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Mythos 5.1

  • Input pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $50.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

  • Input pricing: $0.08/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.30/M tokens
  • Context window: 10,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Mythos 5.1 (Anthropic)

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Claude Mythos 5.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $10.00 for Claude Mythos 5.1 — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Mythos 5.1 and Llama 4 Scout?
Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,000,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Mythos 5.1 costs about $105.00/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Claude Mythos 5.1.
Where can I compare Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.