Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs o4-mini Deep Research

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

o4-mini Deep Research

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

$0.0465
Per Request
$4.65
Daily
$139.50
Monthly
$1,697.25
Yearly

o4-mini Deep Research costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 Opuso4-mini Deep Research
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date3/4/20246/26/2025

Claude 3 Opus vs o4-mini Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and o4-mini Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o4-mini Deep Research is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens87% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while o4-mini Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o4-mini Deep Research offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o4-mini Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o4-mini Deep Research has the edge here at $8.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini Deep Research is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o4-mini Deep Research when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

o4-mini Deep Research (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o4-mini Deep Research today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or o4-mini Deep Research?
o4-mini Deep Research is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 87% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and o4-mini Deep Research?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while o4-mini Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o4-mini Deep Research is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o4-mini Deep Research for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and o4-mini Deep Research costs about $18.00/month. Overall, o4-mini Deep Research has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $8.00 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles