Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs o3 Deep Research

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
OpenAI
o3 Deep Research

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

o3 Deep Research

Per Request:$0.03
Daily:$3.00
Monthly:$90.00
Yearly:$1,095.00

Cost Differences

$0.0225
Per Request
$2.25
Daily
$67.50
Monthly
$821.25
Yearly

o3 Deep Research costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 Opuso3 Deep Research
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$40.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date3/4/20246/26/2025

Claude 3 Opus vs o3 Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and o3 Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3 Deep Research is the more affordable option at $10.00/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while o3 Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o3 Deep Research offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $40.00 for o3 Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3 Deep Research has the edge here at $40.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o3 Deep Research when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

o3 Deep Research (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o3 Deep Research today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or o3 Deep Research?
o3 Deep Research is cheaper for input tokens at $10.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and o3 Deep Research?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while o3 Deep Research supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o3 Deep Research is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o3 Deep Research for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and o3 Deep Research costs about $90.00/month. Overall, o3 Deep Research has lower combined input + output rates ($10.00 in, $40.00 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles