Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B

Compare Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

$0.05118
Per Request
$5.118
Daily
$153.54
Monthly
$1,868.07
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.3 70B
ProviderAnthropicMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryflagshipstandard
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textcode
Release Date3/4/202412/6/2024

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens94% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus. Meanwhile, Claude 3 Opus offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 3.3 70B offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.3 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.3 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 94% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.3 70B?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 68,928 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.3 70B is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 3.3 70B for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles