Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs Codestral

Compare Anthropic and Mistral AI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
Mistral AI
Codestral

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Cost Differences

$0.05175
Per Request
$5.175
Daily
$155.25
Monthly
$1,888.875
Yearly

Codestral costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 OpusCodestral
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$0.90/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipbalanced
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textcode
Release Date3/4/20247/30/2025

Claude 3 Opus vs Codestral: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and Codestral depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codestral is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens98% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus. Meanwhile, Claude 3 Opus offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while Codestral is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Codestral offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $0.90 for Codestral. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codestral has the edge here at $0.90/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while Codestral is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Codestral when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or Codestral?
Codestral is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 98% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and Codestral?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while Codestral supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codestral is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Codestral for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and Codestral costs about $2.25/month. Overall, Codestral has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.90 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles