Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama 4 Scout
Cost Differences
Llama 4 Scout costs less than Claude 3.5 Haiku
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta (via Together AI) |
| Input Price | $0.80/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $4.00/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | efficient | efficient |
| Capabilities | textvision | textvisioncode |
| Release Date | 11/4/2024 | 4/5/2025 |
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 90% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Scout would save you roughly $771.00/month compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Llama 4 Scout when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (code)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)
Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))
Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using Llama 4 Scout today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →